Submitted by Anonymous (UNKNOWN) not accustomed from the website make returns, however yours may be taken as an example and will likely serve our readers. know of your commitment to a speech in favor of mega-mining and that you are connected to an official the same, but your case does not leave the common truth of many of the inhabitants of this town, since the vast majority of us have relatives working there and maybe able to improve their economic situation and it seems fine. Still The next point referred to a board of education authorized training materials for direct descents sometimes with classrooms, TO CONSIDER AND EVALUATE THE CONTENT OF THE MATERIAL TO BE PRESENTED, since in this case as you can see in your booklet, described in every chapter: Ex: Wind Energy Activity gas, oil activity, desertification, etc., he has placed his DISADVANTAGED AND IMPACT, LESS TO CHAPTER REFERRED TO MINING, which only describes the history, types of projects, etc. ., etc., etc., not to mention "AT LEAST ONCE", the word handicap, impact, cyanide, etc., etc., etc., which demonstrates unquestionably that while that was exhibited at the workshop, both in word and writing is not fallacious, IF TRENDS, omitting and concealing information.
Finally, you need to know that this little detail, was discovered just 7 minutes into the presentation, and just finished, we went to Dr. Dina Foguelman ecology with this query and first recognized "We forget drop '. Two members of the team hired by TRITON were consulted on the subject, not knowing that answer, they asked us to Eng remitieramos Mines. The next day, some teachers interested in this omission, published this concern about allowing certain issues, that if we had not remarked, may not have been discussed, SINCE THE FAILURE ON THE RECORD SENT TO APPROVAL OF THE PROVINCIAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION.
Moreover, the final day of the workshop, while you were listening to the talk of Foguelman which maximized the impact of any human activity in the kitchen of the EGB N º 18 and an hour after the withdrawal of the participants, all and every one of the trainers, we discussed this issue in other tones of biased information.
is necessary to know the answers of the Engineer Mine Elena Alonso, author of the chapter and the omission in question and that none of the seven authors of the material (all of them professional) told Alonso that he had forgotten the "MOST IMPORTANT" that would clear up doubts about the mega mining, as even the article that were performed for National Radio.
ENGINEERING IN MINE:
to "I'm not teaching so that teaching can not be omitted that is placed disadvantages and impacts of mining (ask me who makes a teacher not participating in educational material).
b-The Council immediately sent to repair the missing material. (Needless to total the Council has already approved it and the workshop was issued with the intent they tried, though not everything.
c-will be back in June and we'll bring the disadvantages of mining.
d-Etc, etc, etc.
To avoid conflicts, the discussion was conducted face to face locked in a room so as not to bad weather at the "training", advising the "professionals" brought by TRITON to rectify their behavior, which certainly put in check primarily professionalism.
surely believe that this training has no validity, GIVEN ITS INTENTION. The textual content was rendered common, and can be found in any textbook EGB cycle, the Internet or in books devoted to the theme of natural resources. The attitude
both organizers and trainers, is reprehensible therefore intended to underestimate the critical nature of educational trainers, ensuring that the material has no value because no courtly basic elements to be considered as such.